Muller vs. Mortar/PestleApproveRejectUn-ApproveSubscribeUn-Unsubscribe
Question asked 2021-05-12 07:55:59 ...
Most recent comment 2021-05-14 06:44:26
Pigments
Studio Tools and Tips
Most pigments come ground to optimal size, but occasionally an historic or earth pigment (anything larger than about 40 microns) benefits from a bit of grinding. A glass muller (about 5.5 Mohs - yes?) isn't necessarily hard enough for grinding (depending, of course, on the hardness of the pigment being ground), nor does a muller's shape direct force in such a way as to grind effectively (rather, its flat bottom shape seems best suited to dispersing pigments). So a mortar and pestle seems a much better tool for grinding (and the harder the material it's made from, the better; i.e. agate, porcelain). Yet I see mullers often discussed or even recommended for grinding pigments.
Is a muller suitable for grinding (I think of mullers as primarily suited for dispersing)? Is a mortar/pestle unquestionably preferable? Is any substance added to the base of muller to increase its hardness? Any other thoughts? Thanks.
EditDelete
Moderator Answer
(brian baade)
I think that your intuition is correct. A muller is only meant
for dispersing pigments in a binder. There may be some crushing but that would
only be with very friable pigments.
A mortar and pestle is better for this operation but even
then it can be very difficult to evenly grind the pigment. I have found that
it is often necessary to pour the ground pigment through a sieve of the appropriate
degree of fineness and regrind the pigment that remains larger than the sieve
screen. You would continue this until all of the pigment is of the desired
grind.
All of this is quite laborious. It is far easier to just
purchase pigment of the desired grind. I have only relied on the above when
making my own pigments from minerals like lapis or when I am performing an analytical
experiment about art materials and I absolutely need to know that there are no
additional additives (eg hand griding my own green earth from lumps of the
mineral).
EditDelete
Moderator Answer
(koo schadler)
Thanks, Brian. I like the additional clairification of using a sieve, it's a good point. Koo
EditDelete
Moderator Answer
(mkinsey)
It's my understanding that impact, crush, and grinding stress are the forces that reduce stone to powder. Glass muller and roller mill mainly apply shear stress to paint, with not so much crushing force. Shear is the same physical stress as when one presses a spoon into cornstarch in water, sliding it across the bottom of a bowl to break up a cluster or lump. For an improvised studio solution for small quantities, maybe a small rock tumbler would work for this purpose. I know that some have modified electric buffers as a "machine assisted" hand muller, which I think would apply enough rotations to cause the pigment to self-abrade and reduce to a fine grain. I don't know what the buffer disc material was in the modified electric tools, however.
EditDelete
Moderator Answer
(koo schadler)
Thanks, Matthew - I appreciate the imput. Koo
This Page Last Modified On:
restricted
